What gives Irrationalist the right to teach to our children that which they cannot prove to be true?

If Irrationalist can assume authority over other peoples bodies in abortion cases why can't I asssume authority over their childen and them teaching them Irrationalism? A mind is a terrible thing to waste.What gives Irrationalist the right to teach to our children that which they cannot prove to be true?
How can one insist that there faith is anything but moot if they were ascribed there dogmatic identity from childhood. I always believed that if one wants to assume a philosophical identity it would require pensive consideration and venturing into one's self. A child does not have the mentality to make philosophical decisions and cannot even begin to rationalize death and a metaphysical realm. Such tactics to ensure inhibited thinking must be quite detrimental to a child and their development. The entire philosophical process of identity of ones dogmatic identity is crucial. Circumventing this step only establishes a false sense of conviction and appreciation. Children are much like sheep and easily swayed. Children who are forced to adopt such beliefs in such a fashion will only perpetuate this legacy of forced feeding and intolerance. This will forever tarnish their sociopsychological development. I however respect those who came about there faith willing.What gives Irrationalist the right to teach to our children that which they cannot prove to be true?
Your right, schools shouldn't be able to teach the false unprovable theory of evolution to innocent children.
I count 4 logic errors plus atrocious juvenile diction. Not worth it. Later.


Hasta.
Now that is a very politically correct generalization.
That's an irrational question.
Laws, laws,%26amp; more laws.